SynthesisEuropean archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry2026
What are children's perceptions of dental interventions? A qualitative systematic review.
Synthesis in European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo explore the experiences and perceptions of children who underwent minimally invasive dentistry interventions and invasive dental interventions for caries prevention and management.
methodsElectronic searches were conducted to identify studies that used qualitative data to assess the phenomenon of interest up to October 2024. Two reviewers conducted the selection of studies independently and in duplicate. The methodological quality of the studies was evaluated, and the final synthesised findings were graded. Data were analysed using a meta-aggregative approach.
resultsThe search strategy identified 2503 studies, of which eight were included. The methodological quality of the included studies was rated as good. Five categories were developed, leading to two synthesised key findings: dental fear and anxiety in children, and impressions of the guidance provided. Confidence in the synthesised findings was rated as high.
conclusionsChildren's views, as the end users of interventions, reveal factors that influence their acceptance, knowledge retention, coping strategies, and behavioural responses to dental interventions, regardless of the intervention's level of invasiveness. Findings assist paediatric dentists in tailoring communication and care, considering children's emotional self-regulation. Dentists and parents are crucial in fostering positive experiences. Interactive and repetitive methods improve oral health knowledge retention and promote lasting behavioural changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41152552What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.