Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41152547›Full record

ArticleOecologia2025

Food availability influences adult body mass variability and reproductive traits in a spider.

Yuting Dong, Rieta Gols, Jeffrey A Harvey

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuting DongDepartment of Terrestrial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Wageningen, The Netherlands. yutingdong26@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4779-2266
Rieta GolsLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Jeffrey A HarveyDepartment of Terrestrial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All animals require food to survive, grow, reproduce, and thus optimize fitness in nature. Food availability can profoundly affect demographic parameters such as longevity and fecundity. Here, we compared reproductive parameters in the false widow spider, Steatoda grossa (Araneae, Theridiidae), when the availability and size of prey (the house cricket, Acheta domesticus) were manipulated. Adult mated female spiders that were fed weekly (constant prey treatment) produced more progeny during their lifetime than females fed every 3 weeks (intermittent prey treatment). Furthermore, the monitoring of fecundity schedules showed that over the first 10 egg sacs, the mean number of neonate spiderlings per egg sac was around 40% higher in constantly fed than intermittently fed spiders. Time intervals between egg sac productions were generally higher when prey availability was lower. Some females lost more than 50% of their body mass after the production of the first egg sac, although reproductive investment tended to decrease thereafter. The amount of prey offered to females significantly affected mass gain between reproductive events, but fewer progeny were produced by females per egg sac, as well as cumulatively over the first three egg sacs, when they were only fed small prey. Starved females that had not produced egg sacs in several months exhibited total reproductive recovery when fed. Our results demonstrate the importance of prey attributes on S. grossa reproduction. Furthermore, females invest remarkably large amounts of resources during each reproductive cycle and over the course of a lifetime.

Indexed as

Body WeightSpidersAnimalsFemaleFertilityGryllidaePredatory BehaviorReproductionEgg sacFecundity scheduleReproductionSpiderStarvation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.