ReviewNature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology2026
Gut-brain communication: types of sensory nerves and mechanisms of activation.
Review in Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cholecystokinin Induces CaThe European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- Activation of peripheral muscarinic receptors rescues depressive-like behaviors via gut-brain-axis, involving parasympathetic excitation.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2026Article
- Review
- Intestinal muscularis in health and disease.Communications biology · 2026Review
- Vagal neuropathies: An underrecognized potential driver of physical, mental, and immune symptoms.Brain, behavior, & immunity - health · 2026Review
- AI digital-twin ecosystem translating gut-microbiome-neuroimmune signals into precision sleep-mood interventions.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Review
- Acupuncture and moxibustion in irritable bowel syndrome: a mechanistic exploration from heart rate variability to cardiac metabolism.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the locations of extrinsic sensory nerve endings in the gastrointestinal tract and their mechanisms of activation is essential to advancing our understanding of how communication along the gut-brain axis affects health and disease. The gastrointestinal tract detects diverse stimuli (chemical, mechanical and thermal signals) via two major types of primary afferent (sensory) nerves: vagal and spinal afferents. Viscerofugal neurons represent a third pathway that has been indirectly implicated in gut-brain signalling. These spinal and vagal afferents transmit sensory signals to the brain through distinct pathways, and although the origins of their nerve cell bodies are known, their nerve endings remain poorly understood. New evidence indicates that single dorsal root ganglia neurons can give rise to multiple different morphological types of endings within different gut layers, and that Piezo2 channels have a major role in detecting mechanosensory stimuli by gut-projecting spinal afferents. Morphological studies suggest that substances released from enteroendocrine cells can activate the terminals of vagal and spinal afferent endings within the mucosa through a paracrine mechanism. Here, we review the distinct spinal and vagal afferent types alongside viscerofugal pathways revealed by advances in neurogenetic techniques and high-resolution anterograde tracing, linking them to their physiological role in gut-brain communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41152536What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.