ArticleMolecular systems biology2026
Chaperone dependency during biogenesis does not correlate with chaperone dependency during refolding.
Article in Molecular systems biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structural basis of chaperone mechanisms in cells and the evolutionary emergence of the protein world.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Phosphoglycerate Kinase Can Adopt Topologically Misfolded Forms That Are More Stable Than Its Native State.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- From denaturant to ribosome: rethinking chaperone requirements in cells.Molecular systems biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many proteins require molecular chaperones to fold into their functional native forms. However, the roles of chaperones during primary biogenesis in vivo can differ from the functions they play during in vitro refolding experiments. Here, we use limited proteolysis mass spectrometry (LiP-MS) to probe structural changes incurred by the E. coli proteome when two key chaperones, trigger factor and DnaKJ, are deleted. While knocking out DnaKJ induces pervasive structural perturbations across the soluble E. coli proteome, trigger factor deletion only impacts a small number of proteins' structures. Overall, proteins which cannot spontaneously refold (or require chaperones to refold in vitro) are not more likely to be dependent on chaperones to fold in vivo. We find that chaperone-nonrefolders (proteins that cannot refold even with chaperone assistance) do not generally require chaperones to fold in vivo, strengthening the view that chaperone-nonrefolders are obligate co-translational folders. Hence, for some E. coli proteins, the vectorial nature of co-translational folding is the most important "chaperone".
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.