ArticleScientific reports2025
Investigation on performance of steel strut servo system braced deep excavation adjacent to existing buildings: a case study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In response to increasingly stringent safety and construction environmental impact requirements for urban underground engineering, this study investigates the performance of a steel strut servo system braced deep excavation adjacent to existing buildings, using a subway station project as a case study. A three-dimensional finite element model is established to analyze the behavior of the steel strut servo system during deep excavation, focusing on the deformation characteristics of soil and structural members, as well as the factors influencing the system's performance. The findings indicate a strong correlation between the deformation of soil and structural members and the excavation depth, with greater deformation observed at deeper depths. When excavation is completed, the maximum and minimum vertical displacement of soil mass are 24.3 and - 5.8 mm, respectively. The maximum total displacement of buildings A and B is 3.86 and 3.82 mm, respectively. The servo system can inhibit the displacement of diaphragm wall to some extent. The maximum values of the servo area and other areas are 25.21 and 40.4 mm, respectively. The axial force of the strut is mainly pressure, with a maximum value of - 2,883.4 kN. The horizontal displacement of diaphragm wall is sensitive to the change of servo system position and servo axial force value. The deformation control effect is best when all steel struts are controlled by servo system. When the servo system is set with 2 struts, the maximum value decreases as the position of the servo system moves down. In addition, the maximum displacement decreases with the increase of the servo axis force value. This research provides valuable insights for the design optimization and construction control of similar projects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.