Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41152481›Full record

ReviewNature protocols2026

Comparing methods for preparing slippery liquid-like polydimethylsiloxane coatings.

Isaac J Gresham, Hernán Barrio-Zhang, Jae Hyung Cho, Behrooz Khatir, Gary G Wells, Kevin Golovin, Glen McHale, Chiara Neto

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Isaac J GreshamSchool of Chemistry, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5648-3756
Hernán Barrio-ZhangWetting, Interfacial Science and Engineering Laboratory, Institute for Multiscale Thermofluids, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2181-6100
Jae Hyung ChoSchool of Chemistry, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Behrooz KhatirDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, The University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7876-6266
Gary G WellsWetting, Interfacial Science and Engineering Laboratory, Institute for Multiscale Thermofluids, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8448-537X
Kevin GolovinDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, The University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8309-7458
Glen McHaleWetting, Interfacial Science and Engineering Laboratory, Institute for Multiscale Thermofluids, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8519-7986
Chiara NetoSchool of Chemistry, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. chiara.neto@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6058-0885

Funding

Department of Education and Training | Australian Research Council (ARC) FT180100214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Slippery covalently attached liquid surfaces (SCALS, also called quasi-liquid surfaces, liquid-like surfaces and slippery omniphobic covalently attached surfaces) have recently emerged as a new family of materials with many useful properties such as droplet-shedding, deicing and antifouling. They can also serve as model systems in studies of wetting, evaporation and self-assembly phenomena. They are made of nano-thin layers of polymers or oligomers that are liquid at ambient temperature and covalently attached to a smooth substrate. Here we lay out procedures for preparation of the most common SCALS system: polydimethylsiloxane bound to silica surfaces via silane chemistry. The apparent simplicity of these layers and their methods of preparation is misleading, and obtaining reproducible results requires careful control of the reaction parameters. The exact details of the synthetic methods for SCALS determine the observed results; it is therefore essential to report both the synthetic detail and the characterization results to improve reproducibility and to advance understanding of the field. Here a range of synthetic methods used in the literature were reproduced in three different laboratories across the world, their comparative advantages and disadvantages discussed and the resulting SCALS characterized. For each synthetic method, the key parameters that contribute to their performance and ease of reproducibility were identified and optimized.

Indexed as

DimethylpolysiloxanesSilanesSilicon DioxideSurface PropertiesbaysilonDimethylpolysiloxanesSilanesSilicon Dioxide

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.