ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
Customized Education Sheets Generated by ChatGPT Improve Parental Visit Satisfaction and Procedural Knowledge Prior to Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comment on "Customized Education Sheets Generated by ChatGPT Improve Parental Visit Satisfaction and Procedural Knowledge Prior to Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization".Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- The readability and quality paradox: Comparing ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity outputs on pediatric chest pain queries.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Written educational materials have been found to be effective in the delivery of pre-operative information. However, creating personalized educational materials using large-language models (LLM) such as GPT-4 tailored to parental educational level has not yet been described in pediatric cardiology. A prospective single-center quality improvement study from December 2023 to March 2024 was completed with ChatGPT used to generate two pediatric cardiac catheterization information sheets at two different reading levels (6th and 10th grade) to improve procedural understanding by families. Surveys were distributed according to the highest level of education of the parent, along with a clinic satisfaction survey using a Likert scale. Twenty-six families were recruited. ChatGPT rapidly and accurately generated information sheets at the reading level requested. Mean pre- and post-education sheet Likert scale scores for "do you feel well-informed why your child's cardiac catheterization is being done?" were 4.27 and 4.85, respectively, with a significant mean improvement of 0.57 (p < 0.01). Families responded that the education sheet improved their overall satisfaction of the clinic visit with a mean survey score of 4.5 ± 0.8. 96% of families responded that the education sheet improved their understanding of the child's procedure. Our study demonstrates that LLMs such as GPT-4 can be valuable tools to adjust medical education to a specific reading level and augment a pre-procedural visit with healthcare professionals by improving clinic satisfaction and understanding of an otherwise complex procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41152475What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.