ArticleScientific reports2025
Sports injury risk prediction based on temporal graph encoding and graph neural networks: A cross-sport transfer learning framework.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning framework for predicting athletic injuries and optimising performance.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sports injuries significantly impact athletes' health and performance, yet existing prediction methods struggle to capture complex athlete interactions and to generalize across sports with limited data. This study proposes a novel injury risk prediction framework integrating temporal graph encoding with graph neural networks and cross-sport transfer learning. The approach transforms multivariate training data into graph structures using Gramian Angular Fields and Markov Transition Fields, enabling spatiotemporal feature extraction through parallel graph convolution and temporal convolution pathways. A domain adaptation mechanism facilitates knowledge transfer from data-rich source sports to data-scarce target sports. Evaluated on a dataset of 312 athletes across five sports, the framework achieved an AUC of 0.826 ± 0.025, outperforming state-of-the-art baselines, including GAT (0.781) by 5.8%. Transfer learning experiments demonstrated remarkable small-sample performance, maintaining 0.80 AUC with only 50 target domain samples. Feature importance analysis revealed training load (0.182), load variability (0.156), and recovery time (0.138) as primary risk factors. The attention mechanism identified notable athlete interactions (weights > 0.7), providing interpretable insights for coaches. This framework demonstrates a promising approach for injury prevention in the evaluated sports contexts, particularly benefiting sports with limited historical data, and contributes to advancing sports health management systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.