ArticleScientific reports2025
A novel method based on a multiscale convolution neural network for identifying lung nodules.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence construction: a review of the bridge between CT imaging features of lung ground-glass nodules adenocarcinoma and carcinogenic driver genes.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning techniques in image processing are gaining widespread application, with growing research in medical image analysis and diagnosis driven by advancements in image recognition technology. This study aimed to addresses the challenges of lung nodule recognition and classification using convolutional neural networks (CNN) and proposes a novel multiscale convolutional neural network (MCNN) model. The MCNN model integrates Gaussian Pyramid Decomposition (GPD) to enhance CNN-based image recognition for lung nodule detection. A practical study was conducted to apply the MCNN model, and its performance was compared with various algorithmic models and classifiers. Experimental results show that the MCNN model outperforms traditional CNN methods, particularly in detecting solid nodules and pure ground-glass nodules, with an improvement in F1 values of over 2.0%. Furthermore, the MCNN model demonstrated superior overall accuracy in lung nodule detection. These findings underline the practical implications of deep learning in advancing medical image analysis and diagnosis, offering new possibilities for improving the prognosis of lung nodule-relate diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.