Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41152446›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A bias-resilient client selection analysis for federated brain tumor segmentation.

Umme Zahoora, Ahmad Raza Shahid, Farquleet Farhat Gondal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Umme ZahooraInstitute of Space and Technology, Computer Science, Rawalpindi, Pakistan. umme.zahoora@au.edu.pk.
Ahmad Raza ShahidNational University of Computer and Emerging Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Farquleet Farhat GondalNational University of Computer and Emerging Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain tumor segmentation is difficult because of a number of technical problems, including its complex morphology, individual differences in anatomy, irregular shapes, overlapping, homogeneous gray matter and white matter intensity values, abnormalities that might not contrast with normal tissues, and the possibility of additional complications from various modalities. Expert radiologists may make different conclusions as a result of these difficulties. Regarding this, deep learning techniques, particularly CNN models, can be trained to handle these MRI artifacts and automatically extract features that the human eye is unable to detect, such as variations in shape, texture, and color. Deep learning models may effectively learn features across various modalities, but they are data-hungry techniques that could be enhanced with additional annotated data. Yet, data privacy is the main barrier to the real use of data centralization. To deal with these challenges proposed a federated learning approach. The proposed federated learning enables the decentralized learning of a shared model while sharing data. However, the traditional paradigm introduced in the literature involves institutional biases that have an impact on distributed learning. Proposed Fed_WCE_BTD (Federated Learning with Weak Client Elimination for Brain Tumor Detection) is a combination of a modified UNet architecture and federated. In addition, proposed method uses an optimal adaptive client selection strategy by carefully choosing each client based on their unique strengths. Our contribution to this crucial and costly diagnostic is being validated using the BRATS 2021 dataset, taking into account the slicing of brain tumors. The goal of this research is to outperform non-federated learning or perform on par with non-federated environments. At present, the suggested model is outperforming the others by 1% for detection of enhancing tumor and necrosis. The efficiency of the proposed federated learning was demonstrated by considerably higher dice-coefficient of enhancing tumor (p< 0.05) as compared to non-federated learning. However, the edema identification dice coefficient is 80%, which is similar to the baseline.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedDeep LearningHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingBrain Tumor SegmentationClient SelectionFederated LearningSegmentationU-Net

Identifiers

PMID41152446
PMCPMC12568973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.