Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41152443›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Deep learning-assisted CBCT segmentation provides reliable volumetric assessment of mandibular defects compared with micro-CT for 3D printing and surgical planning.

Mohsen Shalalvand, Sina Haghanifar, Ehsan Moudi, Ali Bijani

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohsen ShalalvandStudent Research Committee, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
Sina HaghanifarOral Health Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran. dr_haghanifar@yahoo.com.
Ehsan MoudiDental Materials Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
Ali BijaniSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate volumetric assessment of intraosseous lesions is crucial in various fields, including bone defect evaluation, surgical outcome prediction, treatment monitoring, and 3D model design. High volumetric accuracy is essential for CBCT in digital dentistry applications. However, there is a notable lack of studies investigating the accuracy of volume determination using CBCT. In this study, we examined the factors affecting CBCT volumetric accuracy, namely voxel size, lesion location, and segmentation techniques, to improve diagnostic protocols and optimize the clinical applications of this imaging modality. 28 artificial bone defects were created in the dry rabbit mandible in two regions (Anterior and Posterior). CBCT imaging was performed with standardized positioning at two voxel sizes (0.1 and 0.2 mm). regarding micro-CT imaging as the gold standard. Images were analyzed in DICOM format using ImageJ after preprocessing, and semi-automatic segmentation was conducted via Otsu thresholding with a manually defined external defect border. In Avizo, a ResNet18-encoded U-Net architecture (Avizo's Backboned U-Net implementation) was trained for the multiclass segmentation of the bone, background, and lesions. The volume calculations were based on the voxel counts. Volumetric measurements from CBCT showed no statistically significant difference from the micro-CT gold standard (p > 0.05). However, a significant underestimation of volume was observed when using a larger voxel size (0.2 mm) compared with a smaller voxel size (0.1 mm), irrespective of the segmentation software used (p < 0.05). The choice of software (ImageJ vs. Avizo's deep learning-assisted tool) did not significantly affect the measurements of the porosity. The location of the defect (anterior vs. posterior) also had no significant impact on the accuracy. CBCT is a reliable tool for the volumetric assessment of mandibular bone defects and demonstrates strong agreement with micro-CT. Clinically, our findings suggest that selecting a smaller voxel size (0.1 mm) is paramount for maximizing measurement accuracy in applications requiring high precision, such as surgical planning and 3D model fabrication. The implementation of a deep learning-assisted segmentation model proved to be a viable and efficient alternative to conventional semi-automatic methods, highlighting its potential to streamline the digital workflow in dentistry without compromising accuracy.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyDeep LearningMandiblePrinting, Three-DimensionalX-Ray MicrotomographyAnimalsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalRabbitsBone defectCone beam computed tomographyField of viewMicro computed tomographyVoxel size

Identifiers

PMID41152443
PMCPMC12568968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.