ArticleScientific reports2025
BiliBili, Douyin and Xiaohongshu as health information platforms for stroke: evaluating information quality and content.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Baloxavir marboxil-related information on Douyin and Xiaohongshu: a cross-sectional analysis of content, misinformation, and user engagement.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Article
- Quality and reliability of information about blood glucose monitoring on TikTok and Bilibili: A cross-sectional analysis.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- TikTok, RedNote, and Bilibili as sources of medical information on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a cross-platform content analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Evaluating pulpitis-related content on Chinese social media: platform comparison, dental practitioner impact and associated factors.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Quality and content evaluation of male HPV infection on Bilibili and TikTok: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The reach-rigor paradox in health communication: a comparative analysis of congenital heart disease content quality and engagement on TikTok and Bilibili.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Quality and guideline concordance of neonatal jaundice information on short-video platforms: implications for parental education and newborn safety.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Do likes reflect quality? Engagement metrics and information reliability of robotic surgery short videos.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of semaglutide content on different Chinese short video platforms: a study focusing on side effects.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of myelodysplastic syndromes-related health information on Chinese short-video platforms: a multi-platform cross-sectional analysis.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Quality assessment of dry eye educational videos on Xiaohongshu and differences by uploader type.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Bilibili and TikTok as sources of medical information on osteonecrosis of the femoral head: A cross-platform content analysis.Digital healthArticle
- Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stroke remains a significant global health concern. Despite numerous stroke-related videos on social media, research evaluating their information quality across platforms remains limited. This study compares information quality and content of stroke-related videos on BiliBili, Douyin and Xiaohongshu. This study analyzed 227 stroke-related videos across three platforms (58 from BiliBili, 88 from Douyin and 81 from Xiaohongshu). Information quality was assessed using adapted HONCode and PEMAT-A/V standards. Content analysis examined stroke aspects (definition, symptoms, etiology, assessment, treatment, outcome, complications, risk factors and prevention). Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis and Spearman correlation analysis. Overall, videos showed moderate information quality (72.7% achieving medium HONCode levels). Compliance rates were 4.0% for Principle 4 (source reference) and 2.2% for Principle 5 (evidence for claims). Videos showed higher understandability (median 0.73; IQR 0.2) but suboptimal actionability (median 0.67; IQR 1.0). Content completeness was low (median 2.00, IQR 3.0), with treatment (63.0%) and symptoms (55.1%) mentioned most frequently and assessment (15.4%) and complications (15.0%) less frequently. Spearman's correlation analysis indicated that there were mostly no correlations between video information quality and user engagement (Likes, Collections, Comments, Shares) on the three platforms. Specifically, among the three platforms, Douyin had significantly higher information quality (P < 0.001), while Xiaohongshu showed lower understandability (P = 0.032) and content completeness (P < 0.001). Stroke videos' information quality on BiliBili, Douyin and Xiaohongshu was generally moderate, but commonly lacked evidence support, actionability and content completeness. Among these platforms, Douyin demonstrated relatively better performance, while Xiaohongshu showed poorer understandability and completeness. This study recommends that video publishers focus on enhancing evidence support and actionability, particularly regarding stroke assessment and complications, to help the public access more accurate and complete stroke information. For BiliBili and Xiaohongshu, increasing medical professional participation is recommended to improve information quality. Xiaohongshu needs to improve content understandability by using simpler and clearer language to explain stroke-related knowledge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.