ArticleScientific reports2025
Performance and statistical characteristics of ferronickel slag geopolymer concrete.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates the feasibility of substituting river sand with ferronickel slag (FNS) in geopolymer concrete (GC) through comprehensive experiments on mixtures with varying water-to-binder ratios, aggregate-to-binder ratios, and FNS replacement levels. Key properties evaluated include workability (16-30 cm slump, classified as high-fluidity concrete), compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, microstructure, and compressive strength statistics. Results indicate that increasing FNS replacement reduces slump, while higher aggregate-to-binder ratios or lower water-to-binder ratios further decrease workability. FNS-GC exhibits significant early-age strength development, achieving 72% and 94% of standard 28-day compressive strength at 3 and 14 days, respectively, with peak compressive strength observed at 33% FNS content. Similarly, splitting tensile strength (3.2- 4.4 MPa) reaches 75% and 93% of its 28-day value by 3 and 14 days, peaking at 33% FNS replacement and showing positive correlation with compressive strength. Statistically, compressive strength displays considerable variability (coefficient of variation: 0.07-0.17), maximized at 33% FNS replacement. The strength distribution aligns with normal, log-normal, and Weibull functions, with the Weibull distribution providing the optimal fit for characterizing compressive strength behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.