Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41152373›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Ultrasonic rewarming of cryopreserved alginate encapsulated liver spheroids.

Rui Xu, Tom Brookshaw, Eloy Erro, Clare Selden, Eleanor Martin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rui XuDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK. rui.xu@ucl.ac.uk.
Tom BrookshawDivision of Medicine, Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Royal Free Hospital, University College London, London, UK.
Eloy ErroDivision of Medicine, Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Royal Free Hospital, University College London, London, UK.
Clare SeldenDivision of Medicine, Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Royal Free Hospital, University College London, London, UK.
Eleanor MartinDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK. elly.martin@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

UKRI Future Leaders Fellowship MR/T019166/1Wellcome / EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences 203145Z/16/ZWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid volumetric rewarming methods are needed to enable the effective cryopreservation and recovery of large volumes of biological cells for therapy and banking of tissues and organs. Ultrasonic rewarming is currently under development, but its effect on cells and their post-rewarming viability has not yet been established. Here, we compare ultrasonic rewarming with the gold-standard [Formula: see text]C water bath using cryovials containing cryopreserved alginate encapsulated liver spheroids. Mean rewarming rates are used to establish the exposure time to rewarm to [Formula: see text]C for higher power (100 W) and lower power (20 W) ultrasonic rewarming. These electrical powers correspond to free-field pressures along the central cryovial axis of 2.8 MPa and 1.3 MPa, respectively. Ultrasonic rewarming is faster than the gold-standard (120±5 s), taking 88 s (36% faster) and 34 s (350% faster) to rewarm to [Formula: see text]C with the lower and higher powers. We measure post-rewarming liver spheroid viability and viable cell number across the 96-h recovery period. The lower power improves viability by 1% and the higher power reduces viability by 2% on average, relative to the gold-standard. There were no significant differences in viable cell number between rewarming methods. Our findings will serve as a foundation for ultrasonic cryovial rewarming and demonstrates potential for scaling to larger volumes.

Indexed as

AlginatesCryopreservationLiverSpheroids, CellularUltrasonicsCell SurvivalHumansUltrasonic WavesAlginates

Identifiers

PMID41152373
PMCPMC12569155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.