ArticleScientific reports2025
Study of ethnoveterinary medicinal plants in Metema and Quara districts, northwestern Ethiopia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ethnoveterinary medicinal plants in Aseko District, Arsi Zone, southeastern Ethiopia.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In areas with limited access to modern healthcare, local communities often depend on plant-based traditional medicine for livestock care. However, these practices and the plants themselves are declining owing to sociocultural and environmental changes. This study aimed to document the plants used in ethnoveterinary medicine with associated indigenous knowledge in the Metema and Quara districts. To collect ethnobotanical data, a total of 396 informants from 21 kebeles (the smallest administrative units) were selected. The ages of interviewees ranged from 20 to 81 years, with 267 males and 129 females. The ethnobotanical data collection was carried out using semi-structured interviews, use reports, direct matrix ranking, guided field walks, and focus group discussion. The ethnobotanical data were analyzed and verified using descriptive statistics (frequency and percentage), comparison, use reports, and direct matrix ranking. Nonparametric tests Kruskal-Wallis H and Mann-Whitney U were used to compare indigenous and local knowledge across different socio-demographic factors. This study documented 64 medicinal plants from 32 families, mainly Fabaceae, addressing 37 livestock health issues. The animal species reported to be treated by the medicinal plants were cattle, sheep, goat, poultry, equines, and dogs. Common ailments include wounds and febrile illnesses. Trees were the predominant form (39.1%), with leaves most used (28%), typically prepared fresh. Crushing and drenching were common preparation methods (21.05%), with oral administration being most frequent (45.8%). Piliostigma thonningii and Ximenia americana were the most cited, with 74 and 59 use reports, respectively. DMR highlighted Ziziphus spina-christi and Piliostigma thonningii as important multipurpose species needing conservation. Most informants recognized that abundance of some species decreased in the last years as a result of human activities and climatic changes. Ethnoveterinary knowledge varied significantly (P < 0.05) among informant groups, age classes, education levels, and ethnic backgrounds. Communities in Metema and Quara possess valuable ethnoveterinary knowledge of diverse medicinal plants. Conservation efforts are therefore required to protect these resources. Engaging local communities in conservation initiatives is therefore essential. Future research should focus on the validation of plant bioactivity and the investigation of the antimicrobial properties of the most cited plants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.