Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41152357›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Introducing a hybrid intrusion detection method for IoT-cloud environments based on ResNeXt and improved Ebola optimization search algorithm.

Juan Wu, Shuai Fu, Mohammad Sarabi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Juan WuCollege of Computer and Big Data, Jining Normal College, Ulanqab, Inner Mogolia, 012000, China.
Shuai FuChangchun Humanities and Sciences College, Changchun, Jilin, 130117, China. fushuai@ccrw.edu.cn.
Mohammad SarabiSharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran. sarabimohammad1990@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the advent of IoT and its immense possibilities through cloud randomization, connectivity has matured almost out of proportion; yet this factor has equally opened various attack surfaces thereby rendering IoT-cloud environments vulnerable to multiple attacks. To address the issue, we introduce a versatile approach for hybrid intrusion diagnosis made possible through ResNeXt, a DCNN architecture noted for high efficiency and scalability in extracting features, and the Improved Ebola Optimization Search Algorithm (IEOSA), a novel metaheuristic optimizer fashioned after the spread dynamics of the Ebola virus, yet enhanced to offer speed and reliability in search performance. The proposed approach uses the comprehensive feature extraction ability of ResNeXt combined with the improved searching efficiency of the IEOSA to provide a superior method for the detection of anomalies and intrusions in an IoT-cloud environment. The network attained a detection accuracy of 98.3% and above 97% for recall, F1 score, and precision on standard datasets, including CICIDS 2017 and NSL-KDD. The hybrid framework enhances the performance of traditional and even a few deep-learning techniques, to provide a more secure IoT-cloud ecosystem. The results highlight the opportunity for integrating deep learning with a robust metaheuristic optimization approach for better efficiency and effectiveness in intrusion detection within digital infrastructures.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCloud ComputingComputer SecurityHemorrhagic Fever, EbolaInternet of ThingsEbolavirusHumansCloud environmentsCyberattacksImproved ebola optimization search algorithmResNeXtThe internet of things

Identifiers

PMID41152357
PMCPMC12569087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.