ArticleScientific reports2025
Research on the pore size distribution and durability improvement mechanism of magnetic slurry.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The internal pore structure of cement-based materials plays a key role in medium migration and directly impacts the material’s durability performance. This study proposes a method of regulating magnetic particle slurry using magnetic fields in order to systematically investigate the optimisation mechanism of pore structure under the influence of a magnetic field. Accelerated durability tests were conducted, including freeze-thaw cycles (50 cycles), chloride ion penetration and sulphate erosion (SO₄²⁻), combined with nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) technology to analyse the pore structure evolution quantitatively. The results show that the magnetic field significantly improves the pore characteristics of the slurry, as evidenced by a reduction in the number of capillary channels and porosity. With a magnetic powder content of 20%, the strength loss rate after 50 freeze-thaw cycles was found to be 2.14%. Increasing the magnetic powder content to 25% improves resistance to sulphate erosion by 14.4% compared to the control group. Analysis of the microstructural mechanism revealed that the magnetic field drives magnetic particles to form ordered arrangements, generating a volume exclusion effect that promotes bubble escape while densifying micro-regions through magnetic forces between particles. NMR testing confirmed that, under a 0.5 T magnetic field, the micro-pore throat volume of samples containing 15% magnetic powder decreased by 23.35%. This study overcomes the limitations of traditional pore modification technologies by providing theoretical support and technical solutions for optimising the durability of functional cement-based composite materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.