SynthesisThe European journal of neuroscience2025
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Augment Motor Imagery Training: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in The European journal of neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Augment Motor Imagery Training: A Systematic Review.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motor imagery training (MIT) is a widely used technique for motor learning and recovery. To optimize training outcomes, researchers have explored the integration of MIT with complementary approaches. One such approach is transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), which also shows promise as a method to enhance motor performance and neuroplasticity. This systematic review aimed to synthesize the current evidence on the synergistic effects of MIT combined with tDCS, with a specific focus on behavioral outcomes. Heterogeneous methods across 16 studies with 432 participants in total, including both healthy and clinical populations, yielded mixed results. Nonetheless, the potential of anodal tDCS applied over the primary motor cortex to augment the beneficial effects of MIT for motor performance in healthy participants is suggested by the current literature. The benefits of combining tDCS with MIT in brain-computer interface (BCI) protocols with stroke patients were less clear, which may relate to population differences, timing of stimulation, or the similarity between outcome measures and trained tasks. Overall, small samples and heterogeneous methods limit interpretation of the findings of combined intervention studies, and further research should aim to measure both behavioral and neurophysiological outcomes in larger samples as well as examining longer-term synergistic effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.