ReviewMagnetic resonance in medicine2026
Gadolinium Pollution-A Future Forward Perspective on Human and Environmental Impact.
Review in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-amplified contrast enhancement in brain magnetic resonance imaging for improving image quality and lesion visualization: a prospective pilot study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Gadolinium Pollution-A Future Forward Perspective on Human and Environmental Impact.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The widespread use of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been instrumental in enhancing diagnostic capabilities. However, the potential environmental and human health impacts of gadolinium pollution have become a growing concern. Despite the stability of GBCAs when bound to organic ligands, gadolinium retention in animals after GBCA administration has been well documented, though the biological impact has been uncertain. GBCAs can degrade and release gadolinium. The degree of dechelation is dependent on the GBCA. The chemical form of the retained gadolinium is likely in the form of a salt. This review presents the current known information about gadolinium pollution as it pertains to both human and environmental health. The long-term effects of GBCA accumulation in humans most dramatically have been seen in patients with renal insufficiency through the association with nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF), an iatrogenic disease that was not recognized until after more than 15 years of GBCA utilization. Neural deposition in people after repeated exposures has yet to have proven association with neurotoxicity, but it is widely agreed that exposure should be limited to clinical necessity. Environmentally there is concern for gadolinium runoff, contamination of water systems, bioaccumulation, and compounding ecological harm. We propose strategies for mitigating gadolinium pollution, including reducing the use of contrast agents, improving waste disposal/recovery techniques, and advancing research on microbial remediation methods. Addressing gadolinium pollution will be a collaborative, interdisciplinary effort that begins with improving awareness of the problem, which is what this review intends to accomplish here.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.