SynthesisScandinavian journal of caring sciences2025
Post-Intensive Care Syndrome in Family: A Concept Analysis.
Synthesis in Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effects of eHealth interventions on psychological outcomes of post intensive care syndrome-family: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Post-Intensive Care Syndrome in Family: A Concept Analysis.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Development and preliminary validation of the post-intensive care syndrome-family assessment scale.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimPost-intensive care syndrome in family (PICS-F) is a complex concept impacting the well-being of patients and their families. Understanding PICS-F is crucial for developing diagnostic criteria and interventions tailored to the needs of these families. However, current definitions are limited, necessitating further exploration. This study aims to advance the understanding of PICS-F through a detailed concept analysis, identifying its key attributes, antecedents, and consequences.
designA concept analysis was performed using Walker and Avant's eight-step framework. DATA SOURCES: A systematic literature review across PubMed, Medline, Ovid, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data, and the Chinese Science Citation Database included English and Chinese articles published up to 8 May 2024. Key attributes, antecedents, consequences, and empirical referents of PICS-F were identified through qualitative synthesis. REVIEW
methodsRelevant literature was analysed to identify key attributes, antecedents, consequences, and empirical referents of PICS-F through qualitative synthesis.
resultsOf the 7263 reviewed articles, 66 met the inclusion criteria. Six key characteristics of Post-Intensive Care Syndrome in Family were identified: (1) Inclusive definition of family; (2) Onset or worsening of symptoms during ICU admission, transfer, and post-discharge; (3) Emotional and psychological dysfunctions; (4) Physical impairments; (5) Cognitive dysfunctions; and (6) Social dysfunctions. Antecedents included family, patient, and ICU-related factors. Consequences ranged from a decline in health-related quality of life to potential positive outcomes, such as post-traumatic growth.
conclusionPICS-F is a multifaceted condition that significantly impacts family members of critically ill patients, encompassing emotional, psychological, physical, cognitive, and social challenges. IMPACT: Defining PICS-F enables healthcare professionals to detect and support affected families. Implementing family-centred care and developing specialised interventions can enhance both family and patient outcomes. Furthermore, this analysis highlights the need for training healthcare providers to recognise PICS-F and implement effective care strategies in ICU environments. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This concept analysis did not include any patient or public involvement. REPORTING
methodThis study utilised the PRISMA reporting checklist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.