SynthesisBritish journal of anaesthesia2025
Effects of perioperative benzodiazepine administration on postoperative patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Synthesis in British journal of anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Effect of a Single Immersive Virtual Nature Session on Preoperative Surgical Fear and State Anxiety in Patients Awaiting a Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Randomised Controlled Trial.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- An Update on Pain Management in Pediatric Spine Surgery.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBenzodiazepines are administered during the perioperative period because they are believed to improve the patient experience. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effect of perioperative benzodiazepines on postoperative patient-reported outcomes.
methodsWe included randomised controlled trials of all languages comparing benzodiazepines with non-benzodiazepine comparators in adults undergoing inpatient surgery. Our outcomes were postoperative pain, quality of recovery, patient satisfaction, and anxiety. We assessed risk of bias using a modified Cochrane tool. We pooled data using a random-effects model and assessed the quality of evidence for each outcome using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.
resultsWe screened 33 220 abstracts, 1156 full texts, and 123 RCTs, of which 93 were included in the quantitative synthesis. We identified moderate certainty evidence that benzodiazepines have no effect on patient-reported postoperative pain or quality of recovery and very low certainty evidence that benzodiazepines have no effect on patient satisfaction. We identified low certainty evidence that benzodiazepines result in higher levels of postoperative anxiety (22 trials, n=2165; mean difference, 2.18 points on the 20-80 State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Scale; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-3.30; I
conclusionsBenzodiazepine administration in the perioperative period probably has no effect on postoperative pain or quality of recovery and has an uncertain effect on patient satisfaction (very low certainty evidence). When compared with placebo or another agent, benzodiazepines might result in higher levels of postoperative anxiety. Definitive research is required to determine whether the balance of risks and benefits justifies using benzodiazepines during the perioperative period to improve patient-reported outcomes. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL: PROSPERO (CRD42023440326).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.