Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41151922›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2025

What Is the Difference between an Impulsive and a Timed Anticipatory Movement?

Dominika Drążyk, Anissa Rida, Marcus Missal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dominika DrążykInstitute of Neurosciences (IONS), Cognition and System (COSY), Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels 1200, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4120-6091
Anissa RidaInstitute of Neurosciences (IONS), Cognition and System (COSY), Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels 1200, Belgium.
Marcus MissalInstitute of Neurosciences (IONS), Cognition and System (COSY), Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels 1200, Belgium marcus.missal@uclouvain.be.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0157-8694

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imagine yourself in a car race waiting for the traffic light to go green. Impulsivity could push you to accelerate when the light is still red. In contrast, temporally guided anticipation could lead you to accelerate at the time the light goes green. Whether these two types of early responses rely on the same or different neural processes is an open question. This question was investigated using an oculomotor task where the delay between a warning and an imperative visual stimuli was predictable. The spatial uncertainty of the "go" signal was also varied. On average, 10% of experimental trials were associated with a response before the "go" signal ("early saccade"). After the offset of the warning stimulus, the latency distribution of early saccades was bimodal, with a first mode peaking after 200 ms (1st mode saccades) and a second one starting to build-up after 375 ms (2nd mode saccades). With increasing delay duration: the number of 1st mode responses decreased whereas the number of 2nd mode responses remained approximately constant; the latency and variance of 2nd mode saccades increased; the maximum velocity of 2nd mode responses decreased. In general, the amplitude of 2nd mode responses was larger. These results show that there are probably two independent processes taking place before an expected event: an unintentional release of inhibition evoking an impulsive 1st mode saccade and an anticipatory process leading to a 2nd mode saccade.

Indexed as

Anticipation, PsychologicalImpulsive BehaviorSaccadesAdultFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeTime FactorsYoung Adultanticipationeye movementsimpulsivitytiming

Identifiers

PMID41151922
PMCPMC12618049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.