ReviewAnticancer research2025
Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Uveal Melanoma.
Review in Anticancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Deep Learning Optimisation Strategies for Uveal Melanoma Detection Using Ultra-Widefield Photography.Research square · 2026Article
- Review
- Precision Oncology in Ocular Melanoma: Integrating Molecular and Liquid Biopsy Biomarkers.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite major advances in ocular oncology, early diagnosis and risk stratification of uveal melanoma (UM) remain complicated, particularly in cases involving small or indeterminate lesions. These challenges are exacerbated by limited access to subspecialist care and the constraints of existing diagnostic frameworks. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a powerful tool in oncology and ophthalmology, capable of analyzing complex imaging, cytologic, and genomic data to support clinical decision-making. In UM, AI models have shown promise in improving lesion classification, predicting metastatic potential, and augmenting post-treatment surveillance. This review examines the current landscape of AI applications in UM, including tools for triage, prognostication, and post-treatment surveillance. We also focus on steps that must be taken to achieve end-stage clinical rollout, addressing critical barriers to implementation, such as model generalizability, explainability, workflow integration, and ethical considerations. Moving forward, the convergence of multimodal data, privacy-preserving model development, and patient-centered innovations may help translate these technologies into real-world practice. By addressing current limitations and aligning AI development with clinical needs, these tools could ultimately support earlier detection, more personalized care, and greater equity in access to specialist-driven management for UM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.