ArticleBMJ open quality2025
Quality improvement project to enhance adherence to RCEM standards for patients with paracetamol overdose.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDelayed or inconsistent administration of
methodThis QIP was conducted at Royal Derby Hospital using a multidisciplinary, systematic approach based on Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. Baseline data were collected from 100 randomly selected patients (November 2021-May 2022) and compared with outcomes during a 52-week intervention period (September 2023-August 2024). Interventions included educational sessions, quick reference materials and enhanced prescribing tools. Data were analysed for compliance with RCEM standards, adverse events (liver function derangement and anaphylactoid reactions) and system-level measures, such as length of inpatient stay and timing of paracetamol plasma levels.
resultsA total of 214 patients were included. Compliance with RCEM standard 1 improved from 36% to 43%. No change was noted for standards 2 and 3. Median inpatient stay decreased from 35 hours to 30.5 hours. No significant differences were found in adverse events. Special cause variation was identified in paracetamol plasma level timing, attributed to early sampling in some cases.
conclusionThis QIP addressed problems of delayed or inconsistent NAC administration in the ED by improving compliance with RCEM standard 1 and reducing inpatient stay while maintaining patient safety. Although standards 2 and 3 did not improve, the interventions proved cost-effective, feasible and scalable. Future work should focus on sustaining improvements and exploring patient-centred outcomes across diverse healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.