Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41151767›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2025

Inference and prediction for stochastic models of biological populations undergoing migration and proliferation.

Matthew J Simpson, Michael J Plank

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cell competition driven by secreted ligands: Modeling liver metastasis of colorectal cancer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matthew J SimpsonSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6254-313X
Michael J PlankMathematics and Statistics, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-7539-3465

Funding

Australian Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parameter inference is a critical step in the process of interpreting biological data using mathematical models. Inference provides a means of deriving quantitative, mechanistic insights from sparse, noisy data. While methods for parameter inference, parameter identifiability and model prediction are well developed for deterministic continuum models, working with biological applications often requires stochastic modelling approaches to capture inherent variability and randomness that can be prominent in biological measurements and data. Random walk models are especially useful for capturing spatio-temporal processes, such as ecological population dynamics, molecular transport phenomena and collective behaviour associated with multicellular phenomena. This review focuses on parameter inference, identifiability analysis and model prediction for a suite of biologically inspired, stochastic agent-based models relevent to animal dispersal and populations of biological cells. With a particular emphasis on model prediction, we highlight roles for numerical optimization and automatic differentiation. Open-source Julia code is provided to support scientific reproducibility. We encourage readers to use this code directly or adapt it to suit their interests and applications.

Indexed as

Animal MigrationCell ProliferationModels, BiologicalAnimalsHumansPopulation DynamicsStochastic Processescell migrationcell proliferationcontinuum limitmodel predictionparameter estimationparameter identifiabilitypartial differential equationrandom walkstochastic modeluncertainty quantification

Identifiers

PMID41151767
PMCPMC12567133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.