ArticleJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials2026
Multimodal characterization of intracranial biomechanics in a 3D biofidelic head surrogate.
Article in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rapid head motion causes the brain to deform, which may lead to acute and chronic consequences to normal brain health and function. Since the risk and severity of brain injury correlates with brain strain, computational and physical models of the brain response to impact are commonly used to assess risk and evaluate safety devices in silico. Most physical head surrogates that are used for equipment evaluation, however, are simplified and lack internal measures of brain deformation, relying instead on the interpretation of the resulting head kinematics to predict injury. Developing a more biofidelic physical brain surrogate to improve brain injury risk assessments requires the use of experimental brain motion data. Two techniques, sonomicrometry and tagged magnetic resonance imaging (tMRI), have been independently developed to characterize the in situ and in vivo brain response. Combining data acquired from both techniques can leverage the advantages of each method while alleviating the limitations. The objectives of this study were to create a head surrogate with realistic intracranial geometry and brain simulant for use in multimodal brain deformation experiments. Six gel simulants were tested using shear rheometry, with Sylgard 527 chosen as the best simulant for this study. The headform was created using the average geometry from an MRI template of 20 healthy volunteers, and was tested under non-injurious loading conditions using tMRI and sonomicrometry. The prototype headform showed good contrast in T1-weighted MRI and captured similar strain patterns when compared to the in vivo human response, although maximum principal strains (MPS) were approximately double what is measured in vivo. The two techniques showed good correspondence in brain motion response with trade-offs in temporal resolution and measurement density. Both techniques also showed similar displacement and strain magnitudes with a finite element simulation of the headform. Future studies will focus on including a more realistic sliding condition between skull and brain, as well as optimizing the material properties to better match the in vivo and in situ data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.