ReviewEvaluation and program planning2026
An evaluation of the culturally-centered addictions research training (C-CART) graduate certificate program: A qualitative review.
Review in Evaluation and program planning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrating Primary Care Services into a Rural Behavioral Health Facility in Northern Arizona: Perspectives of Healthcare Providers and Administrative Staff.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Culturally-Centered Addictions Research Training (C-CART) program is a two-year graduate training program designed to train practicing clinicians and doctoral students in health-related fields in culturally-centered research for the prevention and treatment of substance use disorders (SUDs) among underserved rural communities.This paper presents data from the qualitative portion of program evaluation. These data identified the program's strengths and areas for growth, which have been implemented to ensure a better learning experience for Scholars. We conducted ten focus groups with three C-CART cohorts, with a total of 32 Scholars. Thematic analysis revealed that participation in the program was motivated by the program emphasis on culture and research skills, as well as opportunities to connect with community agencies. Scholars were positively impacted by improved research skills and understanding of methods, increased knowledge of the importance of culturally centered practices for SUD prevention and treatment, and enhanced ability to work within interdisciplinary teams. Scholars reported gaining confidence and benefiting from a support network of faculty and peers outside their primary graduate programs.Challenges included managing demanding workloads, interprofessional cooperation, interagency collaboration, and interpersonal issues in community-engaged doctoral research. Future programs should consider how to facilitate collaboration in interdisciplinary research teams, cater to workload demand of doctoral Scholars, and ensure ample opportunities for connection and support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.