Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41151041›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2025

Evaluation of a Novel Goals-of-Care Discussion Priming Tool (MyCare) in Inpatient General Internal Medicine Ward Settings: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Usability Study.

Maren Kimura, Sydney Ruller, Alan Forster, James Downar, Sarina R Isenberg, Leah Steinberg, Kumanan Wilson, Victoria Shaffer, Pete Wegier, Jeff Myers and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Maren Kimura *Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0847-5567
Sydney Ruller *Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5632-5053
Alan Forster *Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2942-2891
James Downar *Division of Palliative Care, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7479-1560
Sarina R Isenberg *Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6059-5366
Leah SteinbergTemmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6687-7265
Kumanan Wilson *Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1741-7705
Victoria Shaffer *Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2533-7115
Pete Wegier *Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0191-136X
Jeff Myers *Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6769-2783
Russell Goldman *Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1667-1004
Carolyn Steele Gray *Science of Care Institute, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2146-0001
Daniel Kobewka *Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1812-2335

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor patients who are seriously ill, conversations about prognosis, values, and goals can improve person-centered care; however, these conversations do not occur consistently.

objectiveWe aimed to develop an online, interactive goals-of-care discussion priming tool called MyCare to facilitate conversations about patient goals among physicians, patients, and family members. Our objective was to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and usability of MyCare for patients who are seriously ill in hospitals.

methodsWe conducted a mixed methods study on internal medicine wards with patients who were seriously ill at 2 hospitals. Participants completed MyCare with a research assistant in their hospital room, and their responses were sent to their attending physician team. Patients, family members, and physicians participated in semistructured interviews to assess advance care planning engagement, usability, and acceptability. Patients also completed the System Usability Scale, the eHealth literacy scale, and survey questions about acceptability.

resultsPatients took a median time of 32 (IQR 21-43) minutes to complete MyCare, with a range of 12 to 101 minutes. The mean eHealth literacy score was 56 out of 100. In total, 19 (76%) out of 25 patients indicated that MyCare helped them think about and understand what was most important to them, and 16 (64%) stated that MyCare helped them think about the type of care they would want if their illness progressed. The mean advance care planning engagement scores on a 5-point scale before and after MyCare were 4.11 (SD 0.77) and 4.20 (SD 0.74), respectively (mean difference 0.09, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.34; P=.22). After completing MyCare, 16% (4/25) of the patients reported feeling more prepared to talk to their medical decision-maker about the type of care they would want if they were very sick or near the end of life, and none felt less prepared. The most useful elements for patients were (1) clarifying goals and wishes for care, (2) identifying people who supported them, and (3) having a resource to facilitate conversations with their families. The most useful elements for physicians were patients' prioritized values and goals.

conclusionsMyCare and similar tools will be more usable and acceptable if they are short and simple, focus on shared physician-patient priorities, and empower patients to advocate for their own goals.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningCommunicationInpatientsInternal MedicinePatient Care PlanningAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFeasibility StudiesFemaleGoalsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient-Centered CarePhysician-Patient Relationsacceptabilitycommunicationdoctor-patient communicationfeasibilitygoals of careill patientinpatientmedicinemedicine wardmixed methodspatient conversationsperson-centered carepilot studyprognosissemistructured interviewstoolusabilitywardweb-basedweb-based tool

Identifiers

PMID41151041
PMCPMC12605267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.