Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41150728›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

Critique of impure reason: Unveiling the reasoning behaviour of medical large language models.

Shamus Zi Yang Sim, Tyrone Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shamus Zi Yang Sim *QueueMed Healthtech, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1701-7747
Tyrone Chen *Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9207-0385

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the current ubiquity of large language models (LLMs) across the medical domain, there is a surprising lack of studies which address their

Indexed as

LanguageMachine LearningModels, TheoreticalArtificial IntelligenceHumansLarge Language Modelscomputational biologydeep learningexplainable AIlarge language modelsmedical AImedicinenatural language processingreasoning behavioursystems biology

Identifiers

PMID41150728
PMCPMC12563542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.