Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41150724›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Micro-offline gains do not reflect offline learning during early motor skill acquisition in humans.

Anwesha Das, Alexandros Karagiorgis, Jörn Diedrichsen, Max-Philipp Stenner, Elena Azañón

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Hippocampal Ripples during Offline Periods Predict Human Motor Sequence Learning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Micro-offline gains do not reflect offline learning during early motor skill acquisition in humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Impaired Online and Enhanced Offline Motor Sequence Learning in Individuals with Parkinson's Disease.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anwesha DasLeibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg 39118, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3582-5574
Alexandros KaragiorgisLeibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg 39118, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1767-3810
Jörn Diedrichsen *Western Center for Brain and Mind, Western University, London, Ontario N6A 3K7, Canada.
Max-Philipp Stenner *Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg 39118, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3694-1887
Elena Azañón *Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg 39118, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9543-1222

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) 425899996Volkswagen Foundation (VolkswagenStiftung) 92977
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While practicing a new motor skill, resting for a few seconds can improve performance immediately after the rest. This improvement, referred to as "micro-offline gains" (MOGs), has been interpreted as rapid offline learning and is thought to be supported by neural replay of the trained movement sequence during rest. Here, we provide evidence that MOGs reflect only transient performance benefits, partially mediated by motor planning, and not offline learning. In five experiments, participants trained to produce a sequence of finger movements as many times as possible. When participants trained during 10-s practice periods, interleaved with 10-s rest periods, they produced more correct keypresses during training than participants who trained continuously without taking breaks. However, this benefit vanished within seconds after training, when both groups performed under comparable conditions, revealing similar levels of skill acquisition. This challenges the idea that MOGs reflect offline learning, which, if present, should result in sustained performance benefits, compared to training without breaks. Furthermore, we observed persistent MOGs even when participants produced random, nonrepeating sequences, indicating that MOGs do not relate to the offline consolidation of a sequence-specific memory. Rather, sequence-specific learning was only evident online, during practice. Finally, MOGs were diminished when participants could not preplan the first few movements of an upcoming practice period. Our results suggest that MOG are simply an effect of slowing during practice, combined with the possibility of preplanning the initial movements after rest, and therefore do not serve as a reliable metric for offline learning or skill-related consolidation.

Indexed as

LearningMotor SkillsAdultFemaleFingersHumansMalePsychomotor PerformanceYoung Adultearly motor learningmicro-consolidationmicro-offline gainsmotor sequence learningoffline learning

Identifiers

PMID41150724
PMCPMC12595466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.