ArticlePloS one2025
Navigating interprofessional collaboration in diabetes care: A qualitative study of early-career health professionals in malaysian primary care clinics.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionInterprofessional collaborative care (IPC) is essential for effective healthcare delivery, particularly in managing chronic conditions such as diabetes in primary care settings. However, early-career health professionals (ECHPs) often encounter significant challenges when establishing effective IPC, given its inherent complexity. This study explores how ECHPs in primary care clinics navigate and engage in IPC for diabetes management.
methodsA qualitative study was conducted from 1st December 2021-1st October 2022 at two Malaysian primary care clinics (urban and suburban). Seven ECHPs meeting predefined criteria (6 months to 5 years' experience, no postgraduate degree) were purposively sampled and interviewed until data saturation. In-depth semi-structured interviews (face-to-face or virtually via Zoom), conducted in either English or Malay, were audio- or video-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis with constant comparison to ensure rigor.
resultsSeven main themes emerged regarding how ECHPs in primary care clinics navigate and engage in interprofessional collaborative practices: (1) Initiating and continuing dialogue, (2) Creating cohesiveness, (3) Effective ways of communication, (4) Having own personal values, (5) Willing to work synergistically, (6) Learning from each other, and (7) Embracing diversities and resolving conflict. These themes represent interrelated components that ECHPs had adopted to effectively engage in interprofessional collaborative practices.
conclusionIPC in diabetes management is a complex system requiring ECHPs to employ interrelated components for effective engagement. ECHPs overcame hierarchical barriers through proactive dialogue, reflecting a shift toward egalitarian teamwork. Digital platforms aided coordination, though face-to-face interactions were preferred for complex cases and direct communication. Team cohesion was strengthened through shared leadership, conflict resolution, and interprofessional learning, enabling ECHPs to adapt and contribute confidently. Educational institutions should integrate emotional intelligence, negotiation skills and digital ethics into IPC curricula. Healthcare organizations must reinforce collaborative practices through policies, mentorship and structured training to bridge theory-practice gaps. Future research should explore informal socialization, peer coaching and long-term digital communication impacts to strengthen IPC support for ECHPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.