Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41150666›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Credit risk prediction model for listed companies based on improved reinforcement learning and Bayesian optimization hyperband.

Cai Yuanqing, Zhenming Gao, Zhang Jian, Roohallah Alizadehsani, Paweł Pławiak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cai YuanqingCollege of Business and Public Management, Wenzhou-Kean University, Wenzhou, China.
Zhenming GaoSchool of Management, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Zhang JianSchool of Law, The University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2277-0078
Roohallah AlizadehsaniInstitute for Intelligent Systems Research and Innovation (IISRI) Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Australia.
Paweł PławiakDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Computer Science and Telecommunications, Cracow University of Technology, Krakow, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The financial sector has experienced swift growth over recent years, leading to the escalating prominence of credit risk among publicly traded companies. Consequently, forecasting credit risk for these firms has emerged as a critical task for banks, regulatory bodies, and investors. Traditional models include the z-score, the logit (logistic regression model), the kernel-based virtual machine (KVM), and neural network approaches. Nevertheless, the outcomes from these methods have often fallen short of expectations. Three major challenges in previous works are feature selection, imbalanced classification, and hyperparameter optimization. This paper presents a method for credit risk prediction for listed companies that uses an off-policy proximal policy optimization (PPO) algorithm for feature selection and imbalanced classification. The off-policy PPO, a reinforcement learning (RL) approach, enhances sample efficiency by more effectively utilizing past experiences during policy updates. This approach improves feature selection and the management of imbalanced classification by optimizing data use, thereby enhancing model training outcomes. Moreover, we use the Bayesian optimization hyperband (BOHB) approach to refine the hyperparameters of the method. BOHB merges Bayesian optimization and Hyperband, significantly speeding up the optimization process. We assess our model using the China Stock Market and Accounting Research (CSMAR), MorningStar, KMV default, Give Me Some Credit (GMSC), and the University of California, Irvine Credit Card Default (UCICCD) datasets. Our experimental findings demonstrate the excellence of the model over existing state-of-the-art models, achieving F-measures of 90.763%, 86.358%, 87.047%, 90.576%, and 89.485% on these datasets. These findings validate the efficiency of the method in economic settings, signifying a major progression in systems for predicting credit risk and enhancing investigative approaches.

Indexed as

InvestmentsMachine LearningAlgorithmsBayes TheoremHumansNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID41150666
PMCPMC12561926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.