Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41150654›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

First Balkan Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-B) among high-risk pregnancies.

Maja Macura, Jovana Todorović, Vedrana Pavlović, Katarina Ivanović, Ivana Novaković, Miloš Milinčić, Miroslava Gojnić

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maja MacuraClinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Clinical Centre of SerbiaBelgrade, Serbia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5924-9199
Jovana TodorovićFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Vedrana PavlovićFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Katarina IvanovićClinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Clinical Centre of SerbiaBelgrade, Serbia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9176-9736
Ivana NovakovićClinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Clinical Centre of SerbiaBelgrade, Serbia.
Miloš MilinčićClinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Clinical Centre of SerbiaBelgrade, Serbia.
Miroslava GojnićClinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Clinical Centre of SerbiaBelgrade, Serbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPregnancy is a particularly delicate period in which many health-related changes lead to changes in the perception of women's well-being, in both physiological and especially high-risk pregnancies. In high-risk pregnancies, the relationship between illness perception and general well-being is even more complicated as sometimes there might not be any apparent signs or symptoms, but the pregnant woman or foetus still might be at risk.

aimsTo assess the validity and reliability of the existing Serbian version of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ) in a specific population of pregnant women with high-risk pregnancies (HRP).

methodsThis was a cross-sectional study including 290 patients hospitalized at the Clinic for Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Clinical Centre of Serbia. The research instrument was a questionnaire with six sections: 1) socio-demographic; 2) pregnancy-related; 3) COVID-19 pandemic-related data 4) B-IPQ; 5) The World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF) and 6) The Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale - 21 Items (DASS-21). Psychometric properties of the Serbian version of B-IPQ were analysed through factorial structure and internal consistency (reliability). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to confirm the original two-dimensional structure of the IP.

resultsAnalysis of internal consistency of the Serbian version of the eight-item IPQ-B showed that Cronbach's alpha of the entire scale was 0.7, indicating good scale reliability. IP correlated significantly with QoL related to mental health, stress, anxiety, and depression levels. The consequence domain of IP affected mental health mostly. IP was one of the main direct predictors of QoL and an indirect predictor through depression, anxiety, and stress levels. Marital status, hypertension in pregnancy, fear for health during the COVID-19 pandemic, and being informed during the COVID-19 pandemic had direct negative effects on IP, and indirectly on QoL.

conclusionsThe Serbian version of IPQ-B has good reliability and validity for illness perception in high-risk pregnancies.

Indexed as

COVID-19Pregnancy, High-RiskAdultAnxietyCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFemaleHumansPerceptionPregnancyPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSARS-CoV-2SerbiaSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID41150654
PMCPMC12561911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.