Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41150646›Full record

ReviewPLoS pathogens2025

Cultivating awareness: How botanical gardens can foster public engagement with plant pathogens.

Dagmar Renate Hann, Gudrun Kadereit

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS pathogens, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dagmar Renate HannFaculty of Biology, Genetics, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, München, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-7898-392X
Gudrun KadereitFaculty of Biology, Systematics, Biodiversity and Evolution of Plants, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, München, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phytopathogens are a growing global threat to food security, economies, and ecosystems, yet public awareness and policy support often lag behind scientific innovations. Despite widespread pesticide use, 20-40% of global crop yields are lost to pests and diseases (FAO). Biotechnology and novel breeding strategies provide powerful tools to counter these threats, but their deployment hinges on public trust. Here, we review the societal risks posed by phytopathogens and cultural differences in public acceptance and regulatory frameworks. We discuss key challenges in plant science communication and the importance of trusted role-model communicators, including a concrete example where science-led storytelling and participatory engagement have accelerated adoption. We further propose that Botanical Gardens can act as scalable and adoptable platforms for plant health science communication to facilitate the translation into real-world applications.

Indexed as

GardensPlant DiseasesAwarenessHumans

Identifiers

PMID41150646
PMCPMC12561983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.