Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41150616›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association2026

Laparoscopic Bilateral Nerve-Sparing Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testicular Cancer After Chemotherapy.

Koji Hatano, Yu Ishizuya, Yuichiro Nakamura, Masataka Kawamura, Shigeaki Nakazawa, Norichika Ueda, Takuji Hayashi, Yoshiyuki Yamamoto, Kentaro Takezawa, Kensuke Mitsunari and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Laparoscopic Bilateral Nerve-Sparing Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testicular Cancer After Chemotherapy.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Koji HatanoDepartment of Urology, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8409-5152
Yu IshizuyaDepartment of Urology, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0778-1308
Yuichiro NakamuraDepartment of Urology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3723-8058
Masataka KawamuraDepartment of Urology, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Shigeaki NakazawaDepartment of Urology, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Norichika UedaDepartment of Urology, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Takuji HayashiDepartment of Urology, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Yoshiyuki YamamotoDepartment of Urology, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1271-3521
Kentaro TakezawaDepartment of Urology, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1137-1846
Kensuke MitsunariDepartment of Urology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Taigo KatoDepartment of Urology, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8681-1407
Yoichi KakutaDepartment of Urology, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Atsunari KawashimaDepartment of Urology, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9369-4264
Shinichiro FukuharaDepartment of Urology, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1336-4316
Ryoichi ImamuraDepartment of Urology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Norio NonomuraDepartment of Urology, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.

Funding

Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research KAKENHI was provided by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 25K02772The 4th CST Education and Training Grant was provided by Japanese Society of Endourology and Robotics
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesNerve-sparing techniques are commonly used in retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) for patients with testicular cancer to preserve postoperative ejaculation. Laparoscopic RPLND is applicable to small residual masses; however, nerve-sparing techniques remain challenging. This study aimed to establish a safe, bilateral nerve-sparing laparoscopic RPLND via the transperitoneal approach. The technique was developed through cadaveric surgical training (CST) and applied clinically.

methodsThiel-fixed human cadavers were used for CST. In patients with testicular cancer after chemotherapy, laparoscopic RPLND was performed based on normalized tumor markers, typically with a residual mass of 5 cm or less. Patients were placed in the lateral position, and four to six ports were used, including the umbilical port; central ports were shared bilaterally. The dissection extent followed a bilateral full-template approach.

resultsIn CST, lumbar splanchnic nerves were identified and preserved, supporting the clinical feasibility of laparoscopic RPLND. The bilateral nerve-sparing laparoscopic RPLND was performed in 10 patients: 6 with non-seminoma and 4 with seminoma. The mean pre-chemotherapy tumor diameter was 2.7 cm (range, 1.2-5.6 cm). The mean blood loss was 165 mL (range, 0-540 mL). The bilateral lumbar splanchnic nerves were preserved in all cases, and postoperative ejaculatory function was confirmed to be preserved in 9 cases. Surgical complications included Grade 1 chyle leakage in 5 patients, all of whom improved with conservative management.

conclusionsA laparoscopic bilateral nerve-sparing RPLND technique was developed to achieve both minimal invasiveness and preservation of ejaculatory function. Long-term follow-up is necessary to confirm oncological outcomes.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyLymph Node ExcisionNeoplasms, Germ Cell and EmbryonalOrgan Sparing TreatmentsSeminomaTesticular NeoplasmsAdultCadaverEjaculationHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetroperitoneal SpaceSplanchnic NervesTreatment OutcomeYoung Adultlaparoscopic surgerylymphatic metastasislymph node dissectionnerve‐sparingtesticular cancer

Identifiers

PMID41150616
PMCPMC12835680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.