ArticleToxics2025
Quantification and Validation of Measurement Uncertainty in the ISO 8192:2007 Toxicity Assessment Method: A Comparative Analysis of GUM and Monte Carlo Simulation.
Article in Toxics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable toxicity assessments are essential for protecting biological processes in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). This study focuses on quantifying the measurement uncertainty of the ISO 8192:2007 method, which determines the inhibition of oxygen consumption in activated sludge. Using the GUM guideline and Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS), up to 29 uncertainty contributions were evaluated in terms of oxygen consumption rate and percentage inhibition. The results reveal that temperature tolerance, measurement interval, and oxygen probe accuracy are dominant contributors, accounting for over 90% of the total uncertainty. The GUM results for oxygen consumption rates were validated by Monte Carlo Simulation, confirming their reliability. The percentage inhibitions showed asymmetric distributions and were underestimated by the GUM method, especially at lower toxicant concentrations. This highlights the necessity of simulation-based approaches for asymmetric systems. Notably, the consideration of correlations in the GUM analysis had minimal impact on outcomes. The findings emphasize the need for the precise recording of measurement time intervals, temperature control, the regular calibration of oxygen probes, and repeat measurements at low toxicant concentrations. Overall, this study enhances the robustness of ISO 8192:2007-based toxicity testing and provides practical guidance for reducing measurement uncertainty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.