ArticleSports (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Impact of Reduced Net Height and Ball Speed Feedback on Spiking Ability in Introductory Volleyball.
Article in Sports (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Thoracic mobility training and performance outcomes in adolescent female volleyball players: a randomized controlled trial.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of the study was to explore the impact of an intervention based on the manipulation of the margin of error and the provision of ball speed feedback on the ability to spike in introductory volleyball. To this end, an exploratory study without a control group was conducted. The sample consisted of two U-14 volleyball teams, one male team with 14 players (13.2 ± 0.75 years), and one female team with 12 players (14 ± 0 years). The intervention involved reducing the height of the net, providing immediate feedback on the speed of the ball after the spike, and challenging the target zone of the spike. It was applied across 12 sessions, with eight spikes per player per session. The study variables recorded in each spiking were ball speed (which was measured using the Pocket Radar Ball Coach instrument), jump height (which was measured using the VERT Wearable Jump Monitor), and target area for sending the ball (which was filmed using a high-speed video camera). The players' perception of the intervention was also assessed. The most significant results indicated that the achievement of the impact in the more restricted target area of the spiking, compared to the larger target area, led to a significant increase in jumping, both in men and women. As maintaining spike ball speed was necessary to validate the challenge, speed values did not decrease when hitting toward the restricted zone. In fact, for male players, there was an unexpected significant increase in spike ball speed. The initial speed was the variable that best predicted the maximum speed acquired throughout the treatment. Reducing the net height while restricting the spiking area can have a positive impact on spike kinematics, provided that spike velocity is maintained.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.