ArticleVaccines2025
Improving the Suitability of Vaccine Design for Immunisation Programmes and Enhancing Vaccine Policy Quality Through User Research.
Article in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe achievement of the goals of the Immunization Agenda 2030 (IA2030) requires vaccines to be developed and implemented that meet the needs and requirements of the final users: vaccinators and vaccinees. A detailed and shared understanding of these needs should inform policy and programme guidance directing stakeholders' efforts and investments. Currently, relevant guidance documents only partially capture vaccine users' perspectives.
methodTo help overcome this gap, we propose an operational research method grounded in the principles of the design approach that systematically maps and integrates user perspectives in vaccine development, policy, and implementation decisions.
resultsThe method, named the seven Ws, guides researchers through a three-step process. First, it clarifies the contribution of a vaccine to solving a public health problem-the solution-problem fit. Second, it maps potential implementation strategies for the vaccine in different settings. Lastly, it describes the relevant vaccine's use cases across the implementation strategies, elucidating the user requirements for the vaccine to be successfully implemented-the solution-provider and solution-user fits.
conclusionsBy explicitly pursuing these three fits, policymakers, vaccine developers, and programme managers will be able to better contribute towards the achievement of the IA2030 goals. This framework is intended as a conceptual contribution rather than an empirical validation study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.