ArticleVaccines2025
Maternal Cigarette Smoke Exposure Does Not Impair Influenza Vaccine Responsiveness in Murine Offspring.
Article in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesEnvironmental pollutants can profoundly affect immune development, yet their impact on offspring vaccine responsiveness remains poorly understood. To address this, we investigated the impact of maternal cigarette smoke (CS) exposure, a major contributor to household air pollution, on influenza vaccine responsiveness in offspring.
methodsPregnant dams were exposed to CS or air during gestation and lactation. Two weeks post-weaning, offspring received two influenza vaccinations. After the booster vaccination, vaccine-specific delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH), serum immunoglobulins, and splenic T cells were analyzed.
resultsVaccinated offspring exhibited robust DTH responses and comparable levels of vaccine-specific IgG1 and IgG2a, regardless of maternal exposure. Importantly, maternal CS exposure did not affect splenic Th1 cell frequency in vaccinated offspring but increased the frequency of activated Th2 cells.
conclusionsIn conclusion, immune development was affected by enhanced Th2 activation, but vaccine efficacy was not impaired. These findings suggest that, under the current conditions of CS exposure (duration, route, and timing) and influenza vaccine dose, vaccine-induced immunity may exhibit resilience even in the presence of environmental immune modulators such as maternal CS exposure. However, these unexpected results highlight the need for further investigation into the broader health implications of maternal pollutant exposure, particularly considering how exposure timing, type, and route, as well as vaccine characteristics, may influence immune development and responsiveness. A deeper understanding of these factors is essential to fully elucidating the clinical relevance of maternal pollutant exposure on childhood vaccine efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.