ReviewVaccines2025
Japanese Encephalitis Vaccine in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs): A Narrative Review of Efficacy, Effectiveness, Safety, Cost, and Policy.
Review in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of natural predators, microbial bioinsecticides, and plant-based bioinsecticides to reduce mosquito-borne disease burden: a systematic review.Journal of medical entomology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Japanese Encephalitis (JE) is a mosquito-borne viral infection that causes acute brain inflammation. First identified in Japan in 1871, the disease gained renewed global attention in 2025 after emerging in a non-endemic region, raising significant healthcare concerns. Vaccination remains the most effective strategy for preventing outbreaks. However, low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) face considerable challenges in implementing vaccination programs due to geographical, economic, and regulatory barriers. Most existing studies on JE vaccines (JEVs) have been conducted in higher-income countries, leaving critical gaps in data on efficacy and safety in LMIC settings. Furthermore, uncertainties surrounding cost-effectiveness make funding decisions more complex. This narrative review evaluates the current evidence on JE vaccination in LMICs, based on a literature search in PubMed and ScienceDirect covering 2005-2025. The review examines vaccine efficacy, safety, cost-effectiveness, and policy implementation. Findings show that JEVs demonstrate high efficacy and strong safety profiles, with mild adverse effects, most commonly fever. The live attenuated SA 14-14-2 vaccine (LAJEV) is particularly cost-effective, offering substantial economic benefits by reducing healthcare expenditures in endemic regions. To ensure sustainability, vaccination programs in LMICs require tailored policies and targeted financial support. Policy frameworks must be adapted to local contexts, enabling focused, effective, and equitable implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.