ArticleVaccines2025
The Burden of Pertussis Disease and Vaccination Coverage in Australian Adults Attending Primary Health Care.
Article in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Replacing ADT With dTpa in Queensland Emergency Departments: Another Opportunity for Pertussis Control?Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe reported incidence of pertussis, a vaccine-preventable disease, has been increasing in recent years. This study aimed to estimate the burden of pertussis and the vaccination rate in Australian adults in primary care.
methodsDeidentified data for participants aged ≥18 years were extracted from the MedicalDirector (MD) primary care software from 2008 to 2019. We estimated the cumulative incidence of diagnosed pertussis in adults by age and risk groups and vaccine coverage in cases and a control group (not diagnosed with pertussis or a coughing illness). We also examined the incidence of unspecified coughing illness in the study population.
resultsOf the 764,864 subjects included in the study, 1788 (0.2%) were diagnosed with pertussis between 2008 and 2019, corresponding to an average annual diagnosis rate of 76.9 per 100,000 population. About 31,110 (4.1%) of adults had an unspecified coughing illness. The highest rate was observed in 2011 and higher in females (63.3%), and the diagnosis rate was stable across all age groups. Underlying chronic conditions were more prevalent among pertussis cases than controls (58.7% vs. 18.8%), with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) being the most common. Overall, 14% of cases received a pertussis vaccination during the study period. Diagnostic testing for pertussis was performed in 34.1% of pertussis cases. Estimated conservative costs per pertussis patient ranged from AUD 473 to AUD 909, with higher costs observed in individuals with complications.
conclusionsIn the outpatient setting, there was a notable burden of pertussis among adults under 65 years of age, particularly those with underlying medical conditions, such as asthma and COPD, which appear to be significant risk factors. Due to the low rate of pertussis testing among all coughing illnesses, a proportion of non-specific coughing illness may be undiagnosed pertussis. The observed low vaccination rates highlight a need for increased awareness, improved diagnostic efforts, and prevention strategies in primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.