ArticleVaccines2025
Reactogenicity of an Inactivated, Split-Virion Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine in Infants and Children Aged ≥6 Months to <9 Years.
Article in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChildren are at high risk of influenza infections and may spread the disease to vulnerable family members. Quadrivalent influenza vaccines (QIV) provide protection against four strains of influenza recommended annually by the World Health Organization (WHO) and have the potential to provide improved protection during seasons with B-strain mismatch between vaccine and circulating virus strains.
methodsWe evaluated the reactogenicity and safety of a QIV (Afluria Quad and Afluria Quad Junior, Seqirus, Parkville, Australia) in children aged 6 months to <3 years and 3 to <9 years over two Southern Hemisphere influenza seasons (2019 and 2020). The rates of solicited local and systemic adverse events (AEs) occurring on Days 1-7 after each vaccine dose were compared between three vaccine batches during each of the two seasons.
resultsOverall, 73.7% of participants aged 6 months to <3 years and 77.5% of those aged 3 to <9 years reported any solicited AE between Day 1 and 7 of SH2019, and 66.7% and 69.2%, respectively, reported any solicited AE in SH2020, consistent with results from prior paediatric studies of QIV. The majority of solicited AEs were mild to moderate in severity. No consistent patterns of batch variation in solicited local or systemic reactogenicity were observed, suggesting no clinically significant differences between vaccine batches. No serious AEs or AEs of special interest (i.e., anaphylactic reaction or febrile convulsion) were reported during Days 1-7 after each vaccination, and no new safety concerns were identified.
conclusionsTogether, these results support a clinically acceptable safety and tolerability profile of QIV in children aged 6 months to <9 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.