Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41150390›Full record

ReviewVaccines2025

Understanding Vaccine Hesitancy: Insights and Improvement Strategies Drawn from a Multi-Study Review.

Kaitlin Quirk Brumbaugh, Frances Gellert, Ali H Mokdad

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Vaccine Preventable Diseases in the Emergency Department.Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Findings from the 2025 AMCP Foundation Symposium: Health Optimization 2.0.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Critical Appraisal On "Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors Regarding HPV Vaccination and Self-Sampling Among US Young Adults".Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kaitlin Quirk BrumbaughPopulation Health Initiative, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-8829-6965
Frances GellertPopulation Health Initiative, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-3151-1320
Ali H MokdadPopulation Health Initiative, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccines are among the most effective public health interventions, significantly reducing morbidity and mortality from infectious diseases. Despite their proven efficacy, vaccine hesitancy has emerged as a pressing global challenge. This review examines the drivers, barriers, and interventions associated with vaccine hesitancy and uptake, focusing on childhood vaccinations and the role of parents as primary decision-makers. Misinformation, safety concerns, and political decisions have contributed to declining vaccination rates, posing threats to public health. The article proposes targeted programs and policies to rebuild vaccine confidence, emphasizing the role of trusted messengers, health literacy, and structural reforms to reduce barriers. Recommendations highlight the importance of accurate information, open communication, and advocacy for school vaccine mandates. The conclusion stresses the urgent need to implement robust policies and community-based initiatives to ensure widespread immunization and safeguard population health.

Indexed as

multi-study reviewpublic health interventionsvaccine hesitancyvaccine safety

Identifiers

PMID41150390
PMCPMC12567618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.