Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41150372›Full record

ReviewTropical medicine and infectious disease2025

From Pediatric to Adult HIV Care: What Works to Keep Adolescents Engaged-A Systematic Review of Transition Strategies.

Po-Pin Hung, Hsi-Hsien Wei

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tropical medicine and infectious disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Po-Pin HungDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Taipei 23142, Taiwan.
Hsi-Hsien WeiDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Taipei 23142, Taiwan.ORCID 0009-0001-3004-3218

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescents living with HIV face unique challenges when transitioning from pediatric to adult care-including stigma, disclosure concerns, and loss of support-that undermine continuity. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science through August 2025 in accordance with PRISMA 2020. Two reviewers independently screened records and appraised risk of bias using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tools by study design; appraisals informed interpretation but did not determine inclusion. Thirty-two studies met criteria; given heterogeneity, findings were narratively synthesized. Post-transition outcomes were suboptimal: retention often declined to ~70% by two years and viral suppression to roughly two-thirds, below global targets. Older transfer age and minimal gaps between pediatric discharge and adult enrollment were associated with better retention. Structured programs combining early preparation, coordinated handoffs, psychosocial/peer support, and youth-friendly adult services consistently improved engagement (often >90% 12-month retention), though improvements in viral suppression were less uniform. JBI appraisal indicated mostly moderate methodological quality with common risks from confounding and incomplete follow-up, tempering certainty. Purposeful, well-supported transition models are essential to sustain treatment success into adulthood; future work should evaluate scalable delivery and long-term outcomes across diverse settings.

Indexed as

adolescent HIVhealthcare transitionretention in caresystematic reviewtransition interventionsviral suppressionyouth-friendly services

Identifiers

PMID41150372
PMCPMC12567669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.