ReviewTropical medicine and infectious disease2025
AmpC β-Lactamase-Producing Microorganisms in South American Hospitals: A Meta-Regression Analysis, Meta-Analysis, and Review of Prevalence.
Review in Tropical medicine and infectious disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
AmpC β-lactamases are class C enzymes that hydrolyze penicillins, cephalosporins, and monobactams. The WHO recently classified third-generation cephalosporin-resistant and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales as critical pathogens. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate AmpC prevalence in hospital isolates across South America. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, SciELO, and Google Scholar. We included 69 observational studies that phenotypically or genotypically identified AmpC producers. A random-effects generalized linear mixed model with logit transformation estimated pooled prevalence; heterogeneity and moderators were explored through subgroup analyses and meta-regression. Seventy studies, including 48,801 isolates, were eligible. AmpC β-lactamases were detected in 11.7% of isolates (95% CI 11.4-12.0), with extreme heterogeneity (I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.