Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41150326›Full record

ArticlePolymers2025

Comparative Study of AlSi10Mg and 304 Stainless-Steel Fillers in PA12 Composites Manufactured Using Injection Moulding Process for Liners and Sleeve-Based Applications: Microstructure, Mechanical Properties, Thermal Stability, and Wear Behaviour.

Nabeel Maqsood, Bilal Islam, Karolis Stravinskas, Oleksandr Kapustynskyi, Romuald Petkevič, Alireza Shahidi, Genrik Mordas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nabeel Maqsood3D Technologies and Robotics Laboratory, Department of Laser Technologies, Center for Physical Sciences and Technology, Savanoriu Ave. 231, LT-02300 Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0003-4875-471X
Bilal Islam3D Technologies and Robotics Laboratory, Department of Laser Technologies, Center for Physical Sciences and Technology, Savanoriu Ave. 231, LT-02300 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Karolis Stravinskas3D Technologies and Robotics Laboratory, Department of Laser Technologies, Center for Physical Sciences and Technology, Savanoriu Ave. 231, LT-02300 Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0009-0007-5012-7842
Oleksandr KapustynskyiDepartment of Mechanics and Material Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Plytines g. 25, LT-10105 Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0001-9321-6449
Romuald Petkevič3D Technologies and Robotics Laboratory, Department of Laser Technologies, Center for Physical Sciences and Technology, Savanoriu Ave. 231, LT-02300 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Alireza Shahidi3D Technologies and Robotics Laboratory, Department of Laser Technologies, Center for Physical Sciences and Technology, Savanoriu Ave. 231, LT-02300 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Genrik Mordas3D Technologies and Robotics Laboratory, Department of Laser Technologies, Center for Physical Sciences and Technology, Savanoriu Ave. 231, LT-02300 Vilnius, Lithuania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents a comparative evaluation of injection-moulded PA12 composites reinforced with AlSi10Mg and 304 SS fillers, with emphasis on microstructure-property correlations linking powder morphology, mechanical performance, thermal stability, and tribological behaviour. Powder characterization revealed distinct morphologies-fine spherical AlSi10Mg particles (D50 ≈ 32 µm) dispersed uniformly in the matrix-while SS particles (D50 ≈ 245 µm) tended to agglomerate, leading to interfacial voids. Tensile testing showed that the elastic modulus of neat PA12 (0.95 GPa) increased by 20% and 28% with 20 wt% AlSi10Mg and SS, respectively. However, tensile strength decreased from 35.04 MPa (PA12) to 32.18 MPa (20 wt% AlSi10Mg) and 31.03 MPa (20 wt% 304 SS), consistent with stress concentrations around particle clusters. Hardness values remained nearly unchanged at 96-98 Shore D across all composites. Thermal analysis indicated that AlSi10Mg promoted crystallization, increasing crystallinity from 31% (PA12) to 34% and raising Tm by 2 °C. In contrast, 304 SS reduced crystallinity to 28% but significantly improved thermal stability, shifting Tonset from 405 °C (PA12) to 426 °C at 20 wt%. Tribological tests demonstrated substantial improvements: the coefficient of friction decreased from 0.42 (PA12) to 0.34 (AlSi10Mg) and 0.29 (304 SS), while wear rates dropped by 40% and 55%, respectively. SEM confirmed smoother worn surfaces in AlSi10Mg composites and abrasive grooves in 304 SS composites. The findings show that AlSi10Mg is advantageous for smoother surfaces and improved crystallinity, while SS enhances stiffness, wear resistance, and thermal endurance, providing design guidelines for PA12 composites in aerospace, automotive, and engineering applications.

Indexed as

injection mouldingmechanical propertiesmetal additive fillerspolymer compositesprocess optimization

Identifiers

PMID41150326
PMCPMC12567212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.