Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41150323›Full record

ArticlePolymers2025

Rheology for Wood Plastic Composite Extrusion-Part 1: Laboratory vs. On-Line Rheometry.

Krzysztof J Wilczyński, Kamila Buziak, Adrian Lewandowski, Krzysztof Wilczyński

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Krzysztof J WilczyńskiHanplast Ltd., 85-862 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Kamila BuziakThe Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Polymer Processing Institute, Warsaw University of Technology, 02-524 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0595-4068
Adrian LewandowskiThe Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Polymer Processing Institute, Warsaw University of Technology, 02-524 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1170-3903
Krzysztof WilczyńskiThe Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Polymer Processing Institute, Warsaw University of Technology, 02-524 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1612-9178

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Common polymeric materials (neat polymers) are quite well known, and their properties are often available in appropriate material databases. However, material data, e.g., rheological data, for materials such as polymer blends, polymer composites (including wood plastic composites), and filled plastics are simply lacking in material databases. This paper addresses the problem of determining viscosity curves for one of the most widely used advanced polymeric materials: wood plastic composites. Studies were conducted in laboratory and production settings, i.e., on-line. Laboratory tests were conducted in two ways: on the basis of classical rheometric measurements, i.e., High-Pressure Capillary Rheometry (HPCR), and on the basis of Melt Flow Index (MFI) measurements, also including tests based on a limited number of measurement points. Tests in production conditions, i.e., on-line, were conducted during the extrusion process using the measurement of the process output (material flow rate) and pressure in a specialized extrusion die. The test results (viscosity curves) obtained from Melt Flow Index (MFI) measurements and on-line measurements were presented and evaluated against the background of the results (viscosity curves) obtained from classical capillary rheometry measurements (HPCR). Due to the lack of rheological data of wood plastic composites in available databases, in-house research methods based on the two-point viscosity curve determination in the plastometric (MFI) tests and the tests under production conditions, that is, on-line, have been proposed. The two-point method, based on the power law model, is quick and easy to implement, and allows for solving many polymer processing issues analytically. On-line tests have the significant advantage of being conducted under the actual flow conditions of the tested material, rather than under laboratory conditions, as is the case with rheometric and plastometric tests, which do not take into account the processing history of the tested material. The issues of rheology and modeling of wood plastic composite processing, e.g., extrusion and injection molding, which have not yet been resolved and require practical solutions, were also discussed. The results of this part of the study (viscosity curves and models) will be used in the second part of the study to evaluate the impact of rheological testing methods and rheological models on the accuracy of process modeling (extrusion).

Indexed as

extrusionrheologyviscositywood plastic composites

Identifiers

PMID41150323
PMCPMC12567470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.