ReviewToxins2025
Botulinum Toxin Treatment in Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia-A Comprehensive Review and Update.
Review in Toxins, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multimodal rehabilitation in PLP1-associated spastic paraparesis: a case report with clinical and biomechanical outcomes.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Using Medline and Scopus as search engines, we identified reports of 10 clinical studies (published up to 1 September 2025) on botulinum neurotoxin therapy for hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP). Nine studies were conducted in adults and one in children. Only one of the ten studies was double-blind and placebo-controlled. The search strategy included only articles published in English and articles providing basic information such as the type of the study, type and dose of the toxin and results of the treatment. Articles not in English, case reports and review articles were excluded. A total of 258 patients were included across all studies. The injected toxin in the open-label studies was botulinumtoxin-A (Botox or Dysport or Xeomin), whereas in the blinded study, the investigators used Prosigne. All open-label studies, which used FDA approved botulinumtoxin-A neurotoxins, demonstrated a degree of motor and non-motor improvement, whereas treatment with Prosigne did not improve patients' function. The possible reasons for this discrepancy between the blinded study and the open-label studies are discussed. We found no studies on the effect of BoNTs on bladder dysfunction in HSP. There is a need for double-blind, placebo-controlled studies assessing the efficacy of FDA-approved botulinum neurotoxins in children and adults affected by hereditary spastic paraparesis. Such studies should also investigate the effect(s) of early botulinum neurotoxin therapy in this disorder. The novelty of this review is that it represents a comprehensive and critical literature review on this subject, with no other studies of this kind published previously. It also includes data not present in previous reviews of this subject.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.