ArticleToxins2025
Anticancer Activity of Snake Venom Against Breast Cancer: A Scoping Review.
Article in Toxins, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Venom-Derived Peptides in Breast Cancer: Pharmacological Mechanisms and Medicinal Chemistry-Guided Translational Development.Archiv der Pharmazie · 2026Review
- A comparison of honeybee and scorpion venoms as anticancer agents against three different cancer cell lines: lung, colon, and breast cancer.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, necessitating innovative therapeutic approaches. This scoping review summarizes experimental evidence on the anticancer activity of snake venom and its bioactive components against breast cancer, drawing from a variety of in vitro and in vivo studies. Aimed at critically evaluating the therapeutic potential and underlying mechanisms, this review consolidates findings on venoms from multiple snake species, including both crude preparations and purified proteins or peptides, revealing a diversity of mechanisms of action. Reported effects include induction of apoptosis, generation of reactive oxygen species, disruption of cell membrane integrity, inhibition of cell proliferation and metastasis, and modulation of oncogenic signaling pathways. In vivo findings further indicate tumor growth inhibition and, in some cases, enhanced efficacy when venom-based agents are combined with nanoparticle delivery systems or conventional anticancer drugs. However, a significant proportion of evidence is limited to in vitro studies, with substantial heterogeneity in venom sources, extraction methods, dosages, and cancer models, which constrains generalizability. There is also a lack of systematic data on long-term toxicity, immunogenicity, off-target effects, pharmacokinetics, and formulation challenges. Taken together, these findings highlight snake venom-derived compounds as promising multi-targeted anticancer agents but underscore the urgent need for standardized formulations, rigorous preclinical safety assessments, and translational research to bridge the gap to clinical application. Future investigations should aim to isolate novel venom-derived compounds, refine delivery strategies, and undertake rigorous preclinical safety and pharmacokinetic studies-ultimately moving toward early-phase clinical evaluation to bridge the translational gap and assess the therapeutic potential of these agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.