ArticleVeterinary sciences2025
Timing, Tools, and Thinking: H5P-Driven Engagement in Flipped Veterinary Education.
Article in Veterinary sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional lectures in veterinary anatomy often limit student engagement and higher-order thinking. The flipped classroom (FC) model shifts foundational content to independent study using interactive tools such as H5P
objectiveTo evaluate the impact of the FC model on student engagement, preparation habits, and cognitive performance in veterinary anatomy, focusing on the respiratory and cardiovascular systems. METHODOLOGY: The intervention was implemented over two academic years (2023/24 and 2024/25) and included continuous assessment, cognitive-level evaluations based on Marzano's taxonomy, platform analytics, and anonymous student surveys.
resultsPlatform data showed high engagement, with completion rates exceeding 90%. Students who prepared 2-3 days in advance performed better on application and integration tasks. Survey responses indicated a shift from passive video viewing to active learning strategies, such as structured note-taking and strategic time management. By 2024/25, 85% of students dedicated 30+ min to preparation, compared to 48% the previous year.
conclusionThe FC model fostered autonomy, spatial reasoning, and clinical contextualization. Aligned with constructivist principles, it supported Intended Learning Outcomes through adaptive scaffolding. Despite institutional challenges, the model proved scalable and pedagogically coherent, warranting further longitudinal research and broader curricular integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.